--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Judged By The Company You Keep
Volumes have been written through the centuries about the importance (or liability) of personal and professional associations.
Put aside any silly notions about Ayers, Wright, Pfleger, ACORN and such radical activist company Obama kept and think about this;
There's no better indication of what Obama really wants for this nation than the words from his own mouth.
Ah, but wait - there seems to be a language barrier.
The Cult Of Obama appears to suffer from a fever and dementia that interferes with their hearing, or at least their comprehension.

Leaders of nations around the globe have not succumbed to the illness, and are perfectly able to interpret the Obama agenda.
Maybe the oceans have hindered the spread of the virulence...

In WEEK 1 of the Obama Age, our president elect was receiving cheers and adulation from the likes of Soviet Communist leader Mikhail Gorbachev, Socialist pop star Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, and Iranian Fascist Mahmoud Ahmadinijad. These people could not
be more happy the United States of America has elected a spineless Socialist to do the job their best efforts have yet to accomplish.

If you don't fully understand the gravity of the history these men represent, or the future they aspire to create for our planet, it can be
safely assumed you voted for Obama yourself. If you are innocent on all counts, and blissfully unaware, your wake up may be ugly.

Oh, it gets better. The Taliban released a statement asking Obama to pull all U.S. forces out of Afghanistan.
Maybe they're tired of dying for Allah and the Koran, and pleading with their "friend and fellow Muslim" Obama is their idea of Plan B. 
This very same week, Taliban members threw acid on several girls walking to school. Their offense? Walking to school. Swell guys.
Three were severely injured with burns on their faces, they will be horribly scarred for life. Guess wearing a burka will be the norm...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wipe Your Ass On The Drapes While You're At It....
During WEEK 1 of the Obama Age, he met with current President George W. Bush (remember him?) for transition talks.
This custom has been practiced for centuries to ensure as smooth and seamless a tranfer of power as possible.
Transition talks have always been confidential - at least until the new President is sworn in. Then he can say what he wants.
No media is ever present for these talks; they have always excluded even immediate staff for the most part.
Evidently nobody told Barack Obama this because as soon as he left the White House and was in the car to the airport he was
telling aids all about it. They in turn "leaked" it to the media with the customary Democrat spin and omission of pertinent facts.
Less than a week after the election, and still over two months from taking office, Obama just shot himself in the foot - again.
That's okay, cuz 63 million people LOVE HIM and if anything bad came from the talks it's all Bush's fault anyway.

Maybe Obama is learning from our last two Democrat Presidents, Clinton and Carter. They can't seem to shut the fxck up.
Clinton wants to cement his legacy every way possible, truth be damned. Carter is simply an idiot - always has been.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Obama Pisses Off Family Of Martin Luther King Jr.
WEEK 1 of the Obama Age saw what a little plagiarism and arrogance can do for your career.
Knowing fully how effective the words of MLK are, as demonstrated in the 40 years since his death, Obama made a decision to
quote him liberally. Not content to stop there, he lifted lines from speeches made by several others including Massachusetts
Governor Deval Patrick and crafted them into his own appearances without a single acknowledgement. 

This reminds me of a line I heard somewhere (I cannot credit the mind from which it came) that said "To steal from somebody is
plagiarism, to steal from many is research." Obama has exceeded even the most gracious latitude of any author, but he's been
given a free pass at every turn - until now. Looks like he finally pissed off the wrong family.
See article below; 


Family of Martin Luther King Jr. Wants Share of Obama 'Change' Merchandise
- Associated Press 
ATLANTA — The family of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. is demanding a share of the proceeds from the sudden wave of
T-shirts, posters and other merchandise depicting the slain civil rights leader alongside Barack Obama.

Isaac Newton Farris Jr., King's nephew and head of the nonprofit King Center in Atlanta, said the estate is entitled to
hundreds of thousands of dollars in licensing fees — maybe even millions.
"Some of this is probably putting food on people's plates. We're not trying to stop anybody from legitimately supporting
themselves," he said, "but we cannot allow our brand to be abused."

Obama accepted the Democratic nomination for president on the 45th anniversary of King's "I Have a Dream" speech, and
America's first black president will be inaugurated on Jan. 20, the day after the federal holiday created to honor King, who
was shot to death in 1968.

While Obama's election may be the fulfillment of King's dream, policing his image and actually collecting any fees could
prove to be a legal nightmare. Much of the great proliferation of unauthorized King-Obama paraphernalia is sold by street
vendors, rather than through official outlets. King's writings, likeness and voice are considered intellectual property, and
almost any use — from graduate thesis papers to TV documentaries — is subject to approval by his estate, administered
by his surviving children.

By contrast, Obama is an elected official so his words and image are in the public domain and may be used without permission.

Farris said he expects to announce deals in the coming weeks to license items featuring images of King and Obama, and
may sell some in the King Center bookstore. The center which sells recordings of King's speeches, postcards, calendars,
mugs bearing images of King, and other licensed merchandise, nets about $800,000 annually. But the family is protective
of how King is depicted, and Farris said any items that are inconsistent with his uncle's message would not be approved.

Any proceeds from King-Obama merchandise would also go to the King Center, said Farris, a member of the estate management
team that reviews intellectual property issues. The family, which refuses to divulge details of its licensing deals, is also
discussing how to go after violators. In the past, the King estate has relied on concerned citizens to blow the whistle on
vendors and manufacturers, who then get a cease-and-desist letter. If that fails, the estate sues.
"If you make a dollar, we should make a dime," Farris said. "That's not happening now."

King's estate sued CBS over its sale of a video documentary that used excerpts of his 1963 "I Have a Dream" speech.
An appeals court ruled in 1999 the speech was covered by copyright and was not public domain, but the estate ultimately
settled out of court for an undisclosed sum.
"They are probably one of the most careful, concerned and on-top-of-it groups of image protectors I've ever met," said
Philippa Loengard, assistant director of the Kernochan Center for Law, Media and the Arts at Columbia University.

Realizing the value of his ideas, King himself copyrighted several of his speeches during his lifetime.
After he died, that duty fell to his widow, Coretta, and, since her death in 2006, to their children, Martin Luther King III,
Dexter King and the Rev. Bernice King. Some scholars have complained about the family's aggressive pursuit of
moneymaking opportunities. "We realize the historic nature of events surrounding President-elect Obama and we are
seeking an elegant solution to address the commercial use of Dr. King's image in connection with our newly elected president," Dexter King said in a statement.

With the siblings already battling in court over whether to publish their mother's diaries, it could be difficult for them to
reach a consensus. Jock Smith, an attorney for Bernice King and Martin Luther King III, warned that any action Dexter King
takes without their approval would be "an illegal action not sanctioned by the corporation."

Street vendors Francis Sarr and Michael Silva said they are not sure whether anyone licensed the T-shirts for sale at
their downtown Atlanta souvenir stand, including one featuring images of King and Obama and the words,
"I HAVE A DREAM ... THAT CHANGE IS GONNA COME." But they said they would be happy to contribute a portion of the
proceeds to the King estate. "By right, they definitely deserve something from it and should give their consent to sell it,"
Silva said. "I guess everyone is trying to cash in."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Doing It For The Kids
On a happier note, during WEEK 1 of the Obama Age an offer was extended to have the First Children, Sasha and Malia, appear on the Hannah Montana show. Sounds nice, doesn't it? Nice little girls, nice TV show.
Nice, safe, warm and cuddly viewing for the entire family without all the harshness from the real world to interfere.

Even this has unsettling undertones, and reinforces the obvious desire of Obama and his handlers to wage a propaganda war to win over the youngest hearts and minds to the Bandwagon Of Change.
Disney, who owns the show, is also the owner of the ABC network and its news organization was complicit in getting Obama elected. 
Big mouse ears make it more palatable for the immature minds now in charge of running the nation to mold the young minds at home.

Things have changed indeed if we're talking about White House children. Anybody remember Amy Carter? The Bush twins?
They were never pimped out for propaganda aimed at ANY age group, nor would anyone have dared to ask.
The media - wider and more varied than ever in format, content and delivery - is now in the tank for shameless Socialist propaganda.
They will stop at nothing, and this includes the feel-good indoctrination of parents who in turn feed the Kool-Aid to their children.
If that reference is lost on you, look up Jim Jones and his church in Jonestown - and explain the difference to me.

Obama Children Or Hitler Youth?
If you think I'm making this up, or reading too much into it, consider the "Obama Song" and video shot with all those cute little kids.
It's all over YouTube and such, easily accessed with a quick search.

The clip starts with text on the screen reading "a recent Sunday... a neighbor's house... Venice, California" and then the singing starts.
The first image is of a flag on the wall styled somewhat like the Imperial Japanese flag of the rising sun from World War Two, with "Voting for change" emblazoned across the top and "Obama '08" across the bottom. I was struck by the likeness of the Rolling Stones lips and tongue logo in the center, made of red and white stripes.

As the camera pans over to the cute little girl singing a cappella, we see her United Nations-blue t-shirt has "HOPE" emblazoned on the front in huge white letters. She finishes her intro, and as the piano and flute come in she is joined by what appears to be an entire classroom of schoolmates wearing the same "HOPE" shirt. The view widens enough to see another banner with the word "CHANGE" on the far wall. All have the appearance of being made by inspired children in a class project with a teacher or two providing enough guidance to ensure they are laid out, proportioned, colored, and detailed for maximum clarity.

Oh, wait. The shirts all say "IMAGINE HOPE" on them. The first word was not visible initially, due to being dark blue on a blue shirt.
Now the children are singing with conviction, ably demonstrated by using dramatic sweeping arm and hand gestures for punctuation.
I'm assuming it's sign language, done in harmony. Should be most helpful for the deaf.

Now the children begin singing in rounds, with the obvious direction of an Oriental woman, as many adult men and women look on.
These are supposed to be the parents? The crowd is as "balanced" as any Liberal's dream with people of all races, colors and attire.
The only thing missing as far as I can see is fat people, and when the song is over the eager parental applause breaks out.
Children then step toward the adults, as if on cue, for their loving embraces and I notice one mom is wearing camoflage pants.
Militant peacenik?

As the end of the show (and video) is apparent, the little girl's voice returns for an encore presentation of her a cappella opening.
There are a few seconds of her onscreen again, then it fades out with "Please...... VOTE!" on the screen.
Vote for who, I wonder.


First of all, this is no living room in Venice, California. It appears to be a school classroom.
Windows are too numerous for it to be a recording studio.
Turns out this was done with the elite of the Hollywood Empire, and there was nothing amateur about it in the least.

Here's a link to a video I found on YouTube that illustrates my point perfectly. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdPSqL9_mfM&feature=related

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kicking A Woman In The Nuts On National Television
Vice-Presidential candidate Sarah Palin was another victim of the WEEK 1 antics of the Liberal media - or was she?
After the election was lost by the Republicans, the media went into hyperdrive spin mode. They were gloating and crowing
about how Palin was such a poor choice and Republicans made such a horrible mistake in nominating her and crippled
their chance of victory.

Then, the "proof" surfaced that she was obviously clueless. An "unnamed source" within the McCain campaign was credited
with leaking details of the debate and speech prep sessions for Palin to review world issues and events. During these sessions,
Palin reportedly lacked the knowledge and understanding of many fundamental issues ranging from politics to simple geography.

This is the sort of "hit piece" journalism most of the TV news organizations love to break first, beating everybody else to the
airwaves with the latest dirt on any Christian, American, heterosexual, pro-gun, meat-eating, Republican conservative -
and Palin qualifies.

They ALL stumbled over themselves to get such stories to as many people as possible, no matter how dubious the source.
The source doesn't matter because it "proves" that Palin is an idiot and, by logical extension, everybody who voted for her is too.
Unnamed source? They don't need a name to go with a story they simply "know" to be true.

Well, Fox News ran this story from the Associated Press (AP) and, oddly, it did not get picked up by most of the others.
Hmmm... 

MSNBC Retracts False Palin Story; Others Duped

Network runs correction on air after reporting an adviser to John McCain had identified himself
as the source of an embarrassing story about Sarah Palin, information stemming from a hoax.

AP - Thursday, November 13, 2008

NEW YORK -- MSNBC was the victim of a hoax when it reported that an adviser to John McCain had identified himself as
the source of an embarrassing story about former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, the network said Wednesday.

David Shuster, an anchor for the cable news network, said on air Monday that Martin Eisenstadt, a McCain policy adviser,
had come forth and identified himself as the source of a FOX News Channel story saying Palin had mistakenly believed
Africa was a country instead of a continent. Eisenstadt identifies himself on a blog as a senior fellow at the Harding Institute
for Freedom and Democracy. Yet neither he nor the institute exist; each is part of a hoax dreamed up by a filmmaker
named Eitan Gorlin and his partner, Dan Mirvish, the New York Times reported Wednesday.

The Eisenstadt claim had mistakenly been delivered to Shuster by a producer and was used in a political discussion
Monday afternoon, MSNBC said. "The story was not properly vetted and should not have made air," said Jeremy Gaines,
network spokesman. "We recognized the error almost immediately and ran a correction on air within minutes." Gaines told
the Times that someone in the network's newsroom had presumed the information solid because it was passed along in an
e-mail from a colleague.

The hoax was limited to the identity of the source in the story about Palin -- not the FOX News story itself. While Palin has
denied that she mistook Africa for a country, the veracity of that report was not put in question by the revelation that
Eisenstadt is a phony.

Eisenstadt's "work" had been quoted and debunked before. The Huffington Post said it had cited Eisenstadt in July on a
story regarding the Hilton family and McCain. Among the other victims were political blogs for the Los Angeles Times and
The New Republic, each of which referenced false material from Eisenstadt's blog. And in July, Jonathan Stein of Mother
Jones magazine blogged an item about Eisenstadt speaking on Iraqi television about a casino in Baghdad's "Green Zone."
Stein later realized he'd been had.

"Kudos to the inventor of this whole thing," Stein wrote. "My only consolation is that if I had as much time on my hands as
he clearly does, I probably would have figured this out and saved myself a fair amount of embarrassment."



Golly, did anybody have any idea that MSNBC was managed by, staffed with, hosted by, targeted at (and largely viewed by) morons?
You mean it's not just Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews that are the extremely Liberal and stupid ones?

Imagine that.

If anybody at MSNBC even has any nuts, I'm sure they're aching, swollen and sore now....

That's justice - served ice cold.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gays Commit Hate Crime, Must Be Prosecuted To The Fullest Extent Of The Law
WEEK 1 of the Age Of Obama, now gays are commiting hate crimes and beating up a 69 year old woman.
Think about that for just a moment.

Here's the news story;


Cross-Bearing Woman Says She Was Attacked by Gay Marriage Supporters, May Press Charges
Thursday, November 13, 2008

An elderly woman who attended a gay rights protest carrying a cross to voice her support of the new California ban on
gay marriage says she was attacked by demonstrators and now may press charges. If charges are filed, Spike said
prosecution could be difficult because the alleged suspect or suspects seen in the video have yet to be identified.
"We haven't been able to identify everyone in that video," Spike told FOXNews.com. 

Palm Springs Police Department spokesman Sgt. Mitch Spike told FOXNews.com no arrests had been made as of
Thursday evening and added that victim Phyllis Burgess still is deciding whether she'll press assault charges.
"The investigation is proceeding as it should," Spike said. Asked if the charges could be elevated to include hate crime
penalties, Spike told FOXNews.com, "That's a possibility. That's one of the things we're looking at."

Carrying a large, foam cross, Burgess, 69, showed up at a rally last Friday against Proposition 8, the ban on same-sex
marriage approved this month by California voters. She was there to show her belief in traditional marriage, she said.
Within minutes, however, angry protesters swarmed around the Palm Springs resident, yanked the cross from her
hands and trampled on it, as seen in a video of the incident posted on YouTube.

"I guess I didn’t see the gravity of the whole thing and how it was being portrayed to the public," Burgess told
The Desert Sun newspaper. "People are incensed. They seem to want some kind of justice."

Here's a YouTube link for the video;  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_ZvPR09N4Q


Never mind.
Since the video footage makes Liberals and gays look bad, it was removed from the site by the "tolerant" folks at YouTube.
In its place is the following message - This video has been removed due to terms of use violation.

Political Correctness is killing this nation. Even YouTube wants you to believe the only bad people on earth are Christians.

The old buttinski woman had alot of nerve to wade into the center of a freak show like she did, but she had every right to be there. 
Gays were upset that the gay marriage ballot issue had failed to pass, and I can understand their displeasure.
(After all, I now have Barack Obama as my President - and you think I'm not pissed off?)

Gays were upset that they were beat fair and square by the very same political activism and networking they've relied on for decades.
Gays were upset that the LDS Church had the audacity to campaign against immoral, deviant behavior that conflicts with their faith.
Gays were upset that a majority of Californians may actually have core convictions and beliefs critical of their public perversion.
Maybe not everybody is an adherent to the "granola" lifestyle of all the fruits, nuts and flakes inhabiting and trying to rule their state. 

Now gays are so taken with the fever and dememtia, the very righteousness of their cause, that they will stoop to assault.
Over the years, how many gays were assaulted, beaten, even killed simply for their sexual "differences" and public disagreement?
In the video, you see a big, scary, macho, presumedly gay man screaming at the woman "We're gonna fight!" and it even frightens me.
(Okay, not really...)
Then it occurs to me, this asshole probably never had a fight in his life - he hid behind the teacher as a child and the courts as an adult.

With the crusades in the courts and legislature, multiple laws were passed giving them "special" consideration for "hate" crimes.
Gays have played the victim card at every turn, and they have bent over the American public to insert their values in all our behinds.

Gays have won the right of preference and protection none of the normal people in the U.S. enjoy including job selection and retention, immunity from ANY sort of critical speech in public or private, health care coverage and benefits, and the freedom to push their agenda upon every man, woman and child. Any resistance to their cause is "proof" of the hate they claim to face. They claim their struggle is far from over and they still have far to go to realize their goals. I think this immoral stupidity has gone far enough. 

The problem I have with all of this, at its most elemental, is that I am not a hater. I don't hate anybody. 
I don't like the whole gay thing, but the few that I know are good, decent people who happen to have a preference other than mine.
They've never done anything stupid or incendiary around me or my kids, so I've NEVER acted against a gay person in my life.

Another problem is if I decide to take up the fight against gay rights, especially if I march, crusade or protest, I can LOSE MY JOB!
I cannot be critical and voice it in any way at my work, and even in public I can suffer legal peril at the hands of an insulted gay person.
To say I do not condone homosexuality labels me as a homophobe. As a married man, I am marginalized and muzzled by law.

I give gays the same latitude and consideration I have always given everybody - as I was taught to do by my parents and the Bible.
But the concept of respect is a mutual thing, not one-sided. I will allow anybody to do whatever they want in the privacy of their own home, as long as there are only consenting adults involved, and nobody is hurt or robbed. I really don't care. Just give the rest of the world the same respect you demand by keeping your carnal/genital habits out of public conversations and displays.

Here's where I'm gonna piss some people off, but what is at the heart of all of this? What do they really want?
They want to have gay sex with no shame. They want to commit lewd acts most people consider disgusting and then celebrate it.
They want the entire nation to say it's okay to sin and then have themselves elevate them to a pedestal of debauchery.
They want parades and parties, and to perform sex acts leaving sperm on their breath and feces on their penis.
Two men committing these acts is sick and disgusting to most normal people, they don't want to think about it but there it is.
They want to commit sodomy and any other acts they choose, and have it validated as something other than sick perversion.
And they will beat up a 69 year old woman to make it happen.

There had better be some hate crime charges filed from this.

Oh, and that big strapping gay man yelling at the old lady and the news reporter - I wonder if he ever "fought" any rednecks or bigots?
Maybe a sufficient number of gays have not been assaulted, beaten and killed for the memory to stay fully imprinted upon them.
Maybe I'll get to applaud them losing "rights" they never had, and the real rights of normal Americans will no longer be tread upon.
Maybe their religious intolerance and bigotry will inspire a backlash from the public and they will get what they deserve.....

Nah, it'll never happen - for a couple reasons.
First, there are too many people in this country who are no longer motivated by fear or passion, but paralyzed by apathy and rhetoric.
If it doesn't matter to THEM, it doesn't really matter at all.

Second, the majority of Americans being moral, lawful, peaceful and respectful citizens precludes them from acting out in opposition to their core beliefs and victimizing others. If they ever had a desire to "fight" against gays, they have jobs and families to consider. 

This leaves only the like-minded, but opposite-acting extremists from the bigoted and hateful margins on the other side to come across and crack some gay heads - and guess who will wind up in jail with hate crime charges filed on them?
It won't be the "fighting" gays.

Sad....